Our issues are not with the media, but with the L2M. It is a flawed process where analysts without officiating experience are using different protocols to evaluate plays than the referees are taught. It breeds inconsistency and frustration for fans, teams, and referees. https://t.co/blAJ2bvWbe
— NBA Referees (@OfficialNBARefs) March 15, 2018
This is not accurate; all calls in L2Ms are evaluated by reviewers trained to rate plays the way officials are instructed to call them; their decisions are approved by ref ops senior staff (former officials) and senior b-ball ops personnel, all with many years of NBA experience https://t.co/KVDXrfDBrm
— NBA Official (@NBAOfficial) March 16, 2018
If the reviewers were trained as referees are trained, they would not have called this an INC. This is a textbook execution of what we are trained to do. We're talking about fractions of a second, undetectable without technology. Watch the visible count: https://t.co/WUDps5DjA9 https://t.co/som0PtI0mi
— NBA Referees (@OfficialNBARefs) March 16, 2018
